The researchers believe they have a good explanation, but the only reason they even get to put it forward is because it doesnвЂ™t contradict the original stance of the Soviet/Russian government. IвЂ™m sure that scientifically the research is solid, but as far as being an explanation itвЂ™s simply too long a strech given that much of the evidence would have to be ignored to make it make sense. We just have better means to visualize now what could have happened and how destructive an avalanche could have been in these conditions. The National Geographic article that spotlights the recently published research paper doesnвЂ™t actually come to any definitive conclusion. like think about it, if you wake up with people in your tent panicking and something (like a sheet avalanche) is clearly Happening outside youre gonna be fucking clawing out of the tent and fleeing too and its even possible that other proposed theories played a hand in things, like maybe there was infrasound being produced by wind conditions which may have contributed to an even more extreme panic reaction in one or two of the hikers.

the accounts of radioactivity are really inconsistent and would have been covered by radioactive elements in their lamps if true.

it DOES explain what got them Out of the tent in a panic, fleeing not entirely dressed, trying to get away from that hillside and not thinking 100% rationally, at which point they were scattered trying to figure out what to do, lost in the dark, climbing trees to try and find the campsite and/or the woods for cover, dying of hypothermia or injuries sustained from falling into a ravine in the dark, at which point their bodies were in the elements for months causing scavengers and general decomposition to eat some of their soft tissues (eyes/tongue). like obviously a sheet avalanche does not explain why they fled on foot, were found missing clothing, there was radiation detected, one tried to climb a tree, some were found missing eyes and tongues. bc the other thing is that ppl will act like if One Single Explanation doesnt fit every single thing then its wrong. Like i think dyatlov pass is one of the best examples of this and a lot of related fallacies.

Megaman x8 armas de zero